io.form/formio-uag

The Form.io Universal Agent Gateway (UAG)

The Universal Agent Gateway (UAG) leverages the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to enable in-process agentic automation using Form.io. It provides to an AI Agent the same thing that our JavaScript Renderer provides to a human; an interpretation of the Form JSON schema into an understandable format. In the case of UAG, it transforms the Form JSON model into an AI readible markdown format so that the Agent can easily understand the purpose and structure of the data that needs to be collected.

Diagram showing how the UAG provides an AI Agent the ability to read and understand a Form.io Form JSON. Similar to how the JavaScript renderer provides a Human the ability to visually see a rendered form.

There are two primary scenarios that the UAG enables:

• Unstructured 'chat' input to deterministic form submission: This capability uses the JSON schema of a Form.io form to produce a deterministic structured data object provided natural language conversational input.

Conversion of natural language to structured data using UAG.

For a working example of this flow, please try out the Conversation Form Example.

• Agentic Form.io Workflows: UAG provides an AI Agent the ability to take existing submission data + "context" criteria in order to prompt an AI Agent to provide its own data and analysis within a workflow scenario. The following example, which shows a college application process using a Form.io application form, shows how this primary scenario works.

Agentic workflow automation example diagram using UAG

For more information on Agentic workflows, checkout the dedicated Agentic Workflows section. For a working example of this flow, please try out the Agentic Workflow Example.

One of the many benefits that the UAG has to offer is the ability to inject Dynamic Context into an AI processing cycle. This is achieved from the dynamic nature of the Form JSON schemas that can easily be modified and deployed to any environment without the need to update your application or re-train the agents within the process. Because of this, dynamic context changes can be injected seamlessly into an existing running process which will automatically update the behaviors of the Agents utilizing the UAG.

Try it out!

There are three working examples in this repo, each spinning up a Form.io server alongside the UAG with Docker Compose. Pick the one that matches what you are building.

There is also a Flow Viewer — a small proxy that shows every leg of an agentic run live, which is the fastest way to see what an agent is actually doing.

Documentation in this repository

This file is the main reference: what the UAG is, how to configure a form for it, how to deploy it, and how to troubleshoot it. The rest of the documentation lives next to the code it describes.

Agentic Workflows

One of the more powerful features of the UAG is the agent_provide_data tool. This tool provides the ability to instruct a generically trained agent how to analyze existing submission data, and then produce its own data by following a configurable Criteria. This behavior historically could only be achieved using a specifically trained agent, which does not provide any benefits of dynamic configurability that the Form.io platform offers. This tool is able to achieve this goal by providing a generally trained agent with the necessary "context" it needs to accurately produce its own data as part of an automated workflow. This feature is particularly helpful if you wish to utilize the UAG within an Agentic Workflow, where the AI Agent is capable of understanding structured data, and then contribute its own data by following the configured Criteria "context" provided by the UAG.

For example, let's suppose you wish to automate the backend administration behind a College Application Process. In this example, a potential student submits an application that consists of many different fields of data, such as Academics, Extra curricular activities, Honors, Volunteer work, as well as possibly written Essays. Historically, these applications would be reviewed by an administrator in order to assess the candidates qualifications for acceptance. With the agent_provide_data tool, it is now possible to automate this process as the following diagram illustrates.

Process example of using the UAG agent_provide_data to achieve Agentic workflow automation

To achieve this feat, the agent_provide_data tool utilizes the following information, which is then fed to the Generally trained agent to produce its own submission data.

• Existing Submission Data: In order for the agent to be able to contribute its own data, it must first have an existing submission to be used as the data that it will analyze according to the configured Criteria.
• Criteria: This is a piece of content that provides the agent the Criteria to follow when analyzing the data, but also provides instructions on how the agent should populate the Required Fields.
• Required Fields: These are the form fields which the Agent is required to fill out as part of the agent_provide_data process.

Setup

To configure a form to use the agent_provide_data tool, you must first designate a section of your form that will be read and used by the AI Agent. This is similar to what you would see in a form that says "For Office Use Only", but instead of a Human contributing to the values of this section, it will be an automated AI Agent. There are two types of fields that can be added to a form to configure it for use by the agent_provide_data tool: Criteria and Agent Fields

A complete setup is four steps, and all four are required:

1. Tag the form uag (described below) — without this the UAG will not register the form at all.
2. Add the Criteria content component that teaches the agent what to do.
3. Add the Agent Fields the agent is allowed to fill.
4. Add a Webhook action to trigger the agent on submission — see the Claude Integration. This step requires the Enterprise Server, because the action has to set a request header and transform its payload; on Community Edition, trigger the integration from your own code after creating the submission.

For a working reference containing all four, see the Agentic Workflow example.

Tagging the form uag

The UAG only registers forms that carry the uag tag. Any form without it is invisible to every agent and to every tool, including get_forms. In the Form Builder this is set under Form Settings → Tags; in a form's JSON it looks like this:

"tags": ["uag"]

This is worth checking first whenever an agent insists that a form does not exist, because a missing tag produces no error anywhere — the form simply is not there as far as the agent is concerned. Note also that newly tagged forms are picked up on the next project cache expiry, so allow up to PROJECT_TTL seconds (see Project Cache and TTL).

Agent "Criteria" component

The first thing that needs to be configured is a special Content Component that instructs the AI Agent how to interpret the data. For example, here is a Criteria content block that was written to instruct an AI Agent on how to assess the submission of a College Application Essay.

An example content of criteria

The goal of this content is to be written as you would write an instruction manual for a new employee who needs to learn how to analyze and understand the submission data that is provided. It is also used to instruct the AI Agent on how to populate the form values that are configured for that criteria. Once this criteria is written, It will then need to be "flagged" as a UAG field by adding a property called uag and the value of that property is to be thought of as the persona of the Agent. This provides the ability to have more than one agent assume different roles as it analyzes the submission data to provide their own values. In addition, the "criteria" content will also need to be provided a uagField property with the value equal to criteria. Below is what a properly configured uag criteria content component looks like.

Image showing how to configure the "criteria" and "persona" fields within a form used within an agentic automation task.

Once you have added this Criteria Content Component to your form, the next object is to add the fields you wish for the Agent to populate. These are called the Agent Fields.

Agent Fields

Anywhere in your form, you can drag and drop fields that can be flagged as Agent fields. Using the example above, imagine your form has a "For Office Use Only" section (maybe a Panel). Within this panel, the first thing you see is a Content Component with instructions on how the following fields should be filled out. This is the Criteria we just described. The next thing that follows are the fields that the Agent needs to populate. Any field that with a property of uag set to the same value as the Criteria content component will be used as the Agent fields.

For example, lets suppose that we have created a form for College Application essays. Below the Criteria may be some fields that the Agent needs to "score" the essays according to the provided Criteria. This may look like the following...

Example showing how the agent fields are paired along with the criteria so that the agent is aware of what fields it can populate.

In order to "flag" each of these fields as Agent Fields, you simply need to add the uag property with the same persona flag that was giving to the Criteria content.

Image showing how the uag custom property is used to flag that this is a field that can be populated via the agent.

Nested Components It is also possible to "flag" a collection of fields with the uag property. This can be done by wrapping all of these fields within a Nested Component (such as Panel, Container, Fieldset, etc), and then all the fields within this nested component will be added to the context of that agent with that persona.

Multiple Personas per form

It is also possible to achieve multiple personas per-form. This is very helpful if there are several isolated evaluations that need to occur within a process. For example, if we look at the flow chart diagram shown above, we can see a College Application Form. The first agentic evaluation occurs when the form is submitted by the applicant, where their application is assessed to be accepted or not. From that point, IF the applicant is accepted, a completely different evaluation needs to occur to award Financial Aid or even Scholarships to the applicant. These would require completely different criteria to assess the submission data differently from one another.

To achieve this, you simply need to "flag" the components uag property value differently with the persona that applies for that field. For the example above, you would add a Content component to assess if the applicant should be accepted, and then provide the following uag property to that content. uag="application". Any fields that need to be filled out by the AI Agent for application approval would also be flagged with the property uag="application". Then, in a different section of the form, you would create a separate Content component with the criteria for the financial admin AI Agent. This content would be flagged with the property uag="finance". Any fields that the finance admin AI Agent need to fill out would also be flagged with uag="finance". This provides a truly flexible and dynamic AI engagement where multiple generically trained agents can be "taught" dynamically how to read and interpret data that is only relevant to that part of the agentic process.

Agent fields do not have to sit next to their criteria, either. A status field in one panel can be flagged uag="application" while the field beside it is flagged uag="finance", which is how a single workflow field can be owned by whichever persona is responsible for that stage.

Chaining personas into a workflow

Multiple personas on a form are only useful if something triggers the later ones. Because each persona writes to the submission, the natural trigger for the second persona is the first persona's write.

This is configured with a second Webhook action that fires on update rather than create, narrowed by a condition on a field that the first persona sets:

{
  "name": "webhook", "handler": ["after"], "method": ["update"], "priority": 0,
  "condition": {
    "conjunction": "all",
    "conditions": [
      { "component": "status", "operator": "isEqual", "value": "scholarshipEvaluation" }
    ]
  },
  "settings": {
    "method": "post",
    "url": "http://formio-uag-claude:3300/agent/claude/agent_provide_data",
    "headers": [{ "header": "x-token", "value": "<your project API key>" }],
    "transform": "payload = {formName: 'application', submissionId: payload.submission._id, persona: 'finance'};",
    "block": false
  }
}

In the college application workflow, the admissions persona sets status to scholarshipEvaluation only for applicants on the scholarship track, so only those submissions wake the finance persona. Applicants who were simply accepted or declined never trigger it.

Avoid loops. The second persona also writes to the submission, which fires the same update webhook again. Make sure each persona's own write cannot re-match the condition that triggered it — in the example above the finance persona sets status to scholarshipGranted, which no longer satisfies the condition, so the workflow terminates. A condition that stays true after the persona runs will loop indefinitely and consume API credits until you stop the container.

A complete, runnable version of this two-persona workflow is in the Agentic Workflow example.

Integrations

In order to aid in the "agentification" of the UAG, we have also provided some "integrations" that can be used to directly communicate with the Generically trained AI Agents to utilize the UAG to accomplish automated AI Agent behaviors. This involves providing a single API endpoint that is capable of triggering the AI Agent process along with the connections to your deployed UAG. These API endpoints can then be triggered using a simple Webhook action within a form to start an Agentic process as the result of a Form submission. Here is a diagram of how specific integrations can be used to achieve a single API call to accomplish an agentic task.

Agentic process flow via single API call into Claude Integration

Each integration runs its own MCP client and connects out to the UAG, so the UAG does not need to be publicly accessible for these to work — it only needs to be reachable from the integration, such as over a private Docker network or on localhost.

These integrations can be found within the integrations folder. The following integrations are provided to enable automated Agentic workflows.

• Claude Integration

Please click on one of these integration links to read how they work.

Integration Version Compatibility

Integrations are versioned independently of the UAG. They share no code with it — each one runs its own MCP client and talks to the UAG over MCP/HTTP — so an integration release does not imply a UAG release, and vice versa. Matching version numbers between the two would be misleading rather than helpful.

Use this matrix to pick a compatible pair. Each row records the UAG range an integration version is known to work against:

Both artifacts are published on every release where their own version changed:

• npm: @formio/uag, @formio/uag-claude
• Docker Hub: formio/uag, formio/uag-claude

When adding a row: bump the integration's own package.json version. CI publishes it to npm and Docker Hub on the next release tag, and skips it automatically when that version is already published — so a core-only release does not rebuild an unchanged integration.

The examples/ compose files reference formio/uag and formio/uag-claude without a tag, so they always pull the current release and cannot drift out of date. If you need a reproducible stack, pin both images to a compatible pair from the matrix above.

Technical Overview

The UAG can be thought of as consisting of many layers of functionality. Each layer is broadly either serving to fetch dynamic context, or submit deterministic data structures. The following layers are leveraged within the UAG:

1. MCP Interface: The entry point of the UAG is the MCP interface that sits between the AI agent and the tools that are executed on the server.
2. Authorization: As part of the MCP specification, every interaction between the AI agent and the backend service must pass through an Authorization process leveraging OIDC (PKCE) authentication. The UAG takes this process one step further, however, by adding an OIDC (PKCE) authentication layer on top of the existing authentication flexibilities that Form.io already provides. Because of this, it is possible to authenticate with the UAG if you are using SAML, Form.io Authentication, OIDC, or even Custom Authentication processes through the Form.io platform.
3. Pre-defined MCP Tools providing Dynamic Context: The UAG utilizes the MCP to provide a number of pre-defined tools that provide AI agents with dynamic context based on the Forms and Resources marked as compatible within the Form.io platform. These tools are described in more detail in a section below.
4. Custom Tools (provided by Custom Modules): This enables developers to introduce any new tools that can leverage Form.io forms and submission data structures to provide additional capabilities introduced to the AI agents. This would allow for custom agent interactions to achieve certain goals for specific use cases.
5. Custom Actions (provided by Custom Modules): Enables developers to create composable middleware that will be executed once all data provided by the AI agent has been sanitized and validated. This provides the ability to interface the data collected from AI agents with any backend system or workflow.
6. Built-in Actions: In addition to any custom actions introduced via a Module, the UAG supports a handful of existing Actions that can be assigned to any form or resource. Actions such as the Webhook that will send a REST API call to any endpoint once any submission has been made by an AI agent. This can be used to point to any serverless function to instigate backend workflows that are triggered from the interactions from AI agents.
7. Pre-defined Forms and Resources (provided by Custom Modules): Allows a developer to release a module that provides default data structures to the AI agent. This would be useful if a developer wishes to create a module that achieves a specific goal, where the data structures required for that goal need to follow a pre-determined set of fields provided by a form or resource. For example, if a developer wishes to release a CRM module for the UAG, then it would make sense that the module would also provide the default Customer and Company resources that commonly accompany most CRM implementations.
8. Custom Database (provided by Custom Module): By default, the UAG performs the data collection and retrieval via a "Submission Proxy", whereas the data is submitted via REST API to either the Enterprise Server project or the Open Source server. This, however, could be modified to send the data directly to and from a Database. This can be achieved via the Database Interface provided from the UAG. For more information, see the Module documentation. This feature does require that the UAG is connected to the Enterprise Server.

Here is a diagram to understand how all of these layers are organized to make up the UAG.

Technical diagram explaining the stack of UAG

Pre-defined MCP Tools providing Dynamic Context

The following tools provided by the UAG can be described as follows:

Custom Modules

While the UAG can be used as a stand-alone system to enable the interaction between AI agents and dynamic JSON forms, the true power of this platform will be realized when developers extend the capabilities of this platform to solve industry specific use cases through the use of Custom Modules and Tools. It is possible for a developer to create a Module that introduces a number of custom tools, actions, and pre-defined resources and forms to achieve interactions with industry specific technologies. They are able to achieve this custom integration capabilities through the use of the following mechanisms:

1. Pre-defined Form and Resources: Using the Form.io template system, a custom module can include a template export of a Form.io project that includes a number of Forms, Resources, and Actions (as well as any Roles and Permissions associated with them). By using the module, this will then automatically "register" these assets so that the AI agent is immediately aware of those assets.
   For example, imagine a module includes a Customer resource with "First Name", "Last Name", and "Email" fields. If you then simply ask an AI agent, "I would like to add a new Customer" the agent will automatically be aware of the context for the customer data structures and know exactly what your intent is when making that request.
2. Custom Actions: Actions can be thought of as composable middleware functions that allow for configurable Express.js middleware functions to be attached to any Form and Resource, and then to be executed once the data being submitted by an AI agent has passed through the proper data validations and sanitization. These can be used to provide custom integrations to backend processes and workflows.
3. Custom Tools: In addition to providing custom actions, a Module can also introduce custom MCP Tools to provide bespoke interaction capabilities between the UAG and the AI agents for any industry specific purposes.
4. Custom Authentication: A module can also modify the "authentication" landing page to assist with any custom requirements that are needed around Authentication.
5. Behavior Overrides: A module also has the ability to "override" any default behavior from the UAG. This ensures that whomever is using a certain module can "tweak" certain tools and responses to achieve better results as it pertains to their industry specific needs.

Form.io aims to enable developers to build and contribute their own custom modules to the broader community through GitHub and NPM.

Using a Custom Module

Once a custom module is developed, anyone can install that module (via NPM) and then easily use your module in the following way...

_{This is just an example.}

import { UAGServer } from '@formio/uag';
import { ExampleUAG } from '@example/uag';
import Express from 'express';
try {
    (async function () {
        const server = new UAGServer();
        server.use(ExampleUAG);
        const app = Express();
        app.use(await server.router());
        const port = process.env.PORT || 3200;
        app.listen(port, () => {
            console.log(`Form.io UAG server running on port ${port}`);
            console.log(`Visit http://localhost:${port} to access the application`);
        });
    })();
} catch (error) {
    console.error('Failed to start server:', error);
    process.exit(1);
}

To get started in building your own custom module, go to the help documentation at Modules Readme.

Deploying UAG

The following sections describe the process of creating a running instance of UAG, connecting it to the Form.io Platform, and configuring an AI agent to use it.

This documentation focuses on using UAG with Form.io Open Source. For documentation on using UAG with Form.io Enterprise, refer to https://help.form.io/uag.

How Agents Connect

Before deploying, it is worth deciding which side opens the connection to the UAG's /mcp endpoint, because that single decision determines whether the UAG needs to be publicly accessible.

With a local MCP client, your application connects out to the UAG, calls the tools itself, and passes the results on to whichever model it is using. Nothing dials back in, so the UAG can stay entirely inside your network. This is how the Claude Integration works, and it is the recommended model for server-to-server and webhook-triggered automation — including running the whole stack on a developer machine.

If you are using the published Claude integration image, this requires formio/uag-claude:1.3.0 or newer. Earlier images handed the MCP server URL to the Anthropic API as a remote connector, meaning the API dialed into your UAG and a public URL was mandatory. An older image pointed at a private address fails with a 400 from the Anthropic API reading Connection error while communicating with MCP server, which looks like a UAG fault but is not one.

With a remote MCP client, the agent lives outside your network and connects in, so /mcp and the .well-known OAuth discovery endpoints must be publicly reachable over HTTPS, and BASE_URL must be that public URL. See Domain and URL Configuration.

Both models can be used against the same UAG deployment at the same time.

Authenticating a local MCP client

A remote agent authenticates through the browser-based OAuth (PKCE) flow. A local client has no browser, so it exchanges a server-side key for an access token using the client_credentials grant against {{ BASE_URL }}/auth/token, then sends that token as a Bearer token on its /mcp requests.

The client_id must be prefixed with the project name — which is formio-oss for Open Source deployments:

POST /auth/token
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "grant_type": "client_credentials",
  "client_id": "formio-oss-x-admin-key",
  "client_secret": "{{ ADMIN_KEY }}"
}

For Enterprise, use the project name from your project endpoint together with the project API key — for example "client_id": "myproject-x-token" with "client_secret": "{{ PROJECT_KEY }}".

The response contains an access_token, which is passed to the UAG as Authorization: Bearer {{ access_token }}. Tokens expire according to JWT_EXPIRE_TIME, so long-running clients should cache the token and refresh it before it expires. See integrations/claude/auth.js for a working implementation.

Runtime Environments

There are currently two run-time environments that work with the UAG:

• Docker
• Node.js (Express)

Docker

Running the UAG in Docker enables a wide range of deployment options into common hosting environments such as AWS and Azure. Additionally, it allows for the use of common orchestration runtimes such as Kubernetes and Docker Compose. The container that you will run the UAG is as follows:

formio/uag

This container can be run in two ways:

• Docker-Compose.yml - The recommended method, deploys as a multi-container Docker Compose stack.
• Docker Run - a standalone container using the common docker run command.

Docker Compose (Recommended)

The recommended way to launch the UAG is through Docker Compose. This enables you to orchestrate several of the containers to run within a single instance to provide a more seamless and simple way of managing your deployments. Here is a simple example of how to run both the Form.io UAG + Form.io OSS server on the same instance.

docker-compose.yml

services:
  mongo:
    image: mongo
    restart: always
    volumes:
      - ./data/db:/data/db
    environment:
      - MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME
      - MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD
  formio:
    image: formio/formio:rc
    restart: always
    links:
      - mongo
    depends_on:
      - mongo
    environment:
      PORT: 3000
      DEBUG: formio.*
      NODE_CONFIG: '{"mongo": "mongodb://mongo:27017/formio-oss", "jwt": {"secret": "CHANGEME"}, "mongoSecret": "CHANGEME"}'
      ROOT_EMAIL: admin@example.com
      ROOT_PASSWORD: CHANGEME
      ADMIN_KEY: CHANGEME
    ports:
      - "3000:3000"
  formio-uag:
    image: formio/uag
    restart: always
    links:
      - formio
    depends_on:
      - formio
    environment:
      PORT: 3200
      DEBUG: formio.*
      PROJECT: http://formio:3000
      ADMIN_KEY: CHANGEME
      JWT_SECRET: CHANGEME
      JWT_EXPIRE_TIME: 525600
      LOGIN_FORM: http://localhost:3000/user/login
      # The address clients reach the UAG at — this is the UAG's own port,
      # not the Form.io server's. See the BASE_URL section below.
      BASE_URL: http://localhost:3200
    ports:
      - "3200:3200"

This can be run by typing the following...

docker compose up -d

Docker Run

Here are some examples of running the UAG using the docker run command.

UAG pointed to an Open Source server

docker run -d \
  -e "PROJECT=https://forms.mysite.com" \
  -e "ADMIN_KEY=CHANGEME" \
  -e "JWT_SECRET=CHANGEME" \
  -e "BASE_URL=https://forms.mysite.com" \
  -e "LOGIN_FORM=https://forms.mysite.com/user/login" \
  -e "PORT=3200" \
  --restart unless-stopped \
  --network formio \
  --name formio-uag \
  -p 3200:3200 \
  formio/uag

UAG pointed to a Form.io Enterprise Server

docker run -d \
  -e "PROJECT=https://forms.mysite.com/myproject" \
  -e "PROJECT_KEY=CHANGEME" \
  -e "UAG_LICENSE=YOUR-LICENSE" \
  -e "JWT_SECRET=CHANGEME" \
  -e "PORTAL_SECRET=CHANGEME" \
  -e "BASE_URL=https://forms.mysite.com" \
  -e "LOGIN_FORM=https://forms.mysite.com/myproject/user/login" \
  -e "PORT=3200" \
  --restart unless-stopped \
  --network formio \
  --name formio-uag \
  -p 3200:3200 \
  formio/uag

Once it is running, you can then navigate to the following to access both the OSS Deployment + UAG Server

• http://localhost:3000: The Form.io OSS Server
• http://localhost:3200: The UAG Server

In both the Node.js runtime environment as well as Docker, the way to control the UAG is through the use of Environment Variables and Modules.

Environment Variables

This module can be configured in many ways. One of those ways is through the use of Environment Variables, which are documented as follows.

Project Cache and TTL

By default, the UAG uses a TTL to "fetch" any of the project assets and register them and cache them into the UAG. What this means is that if you make any changes to your underlying project forms and resources (either directly or through a deployment), you need to wait a maximum of the TTL setting (in seconds) to see any updates that have been made. For example, if the TTL is set to 900 (or 15 minutes), and you make a change to any forms and resources, you must wait at most 15 minutes to see any of these changes take effect into the UAG. It should be noted that when a "refresh" occurs, an API call to the "export" method is called on the underlying project endpoint. This is a processor intensive API call, so it is not recommended to set the TTL to any value less than 60. A value of 0 is interpreted as "No TTL", which means the only way to refresh the project forms and resources, a UAG reboot is necessary.

Here is a table explaining how this parameter can be used.

This cache is the reason a form edit does not appear to take effect immediately. Anything that changes what the agent knows — adding the uag tag, rewriting a Criteria content component, adding or removing Agent Fields — only reaches the agent after the next expiry. When you are actively iterating on criteria, restarting the UAG re-registers the project immediately instead of waiting:

docker restart formio-uag

Domain and URL Configuration

There are 3 different "domain" environment variables that matter, and it is important to understand how to configure them depending on your use case. Whether any of them need to be public depends on how agents connect — see How Agents Connect.

If a remote agent connects into your UAG, these must be configured correctly and publicly, or the agent will not be able to authenticate. If you only use a local MCP client, all three can point at private or localhost addresses.

PROJECT

The PROJECT environment variable is used to establish a connection from the UAG server to the project endpoint (for Enterprise) or OSS base url. This does NOT need to be a public DNS entry, but rather a URL that connects the UAG container to the Server container. The following examples illustrate how this would be configured.

Local connection to OSS Server

If you are using a local connection, such as within a Docker Compose file, you can configure the PROJECT environment variable to point directly to the local url as follows.

docker-compose.yml

services:
  formio:
    image: formio/formio:rc
    restart: always
    environment:
      PORT: 3000
      ADMIN_KEY: CHANGEME
  formio-uag:
    image: formio/uag
    restart: always
    links:
      - formio
    depends_on:
      - formio
    environment:
      PROJECT: http://formio:3000
      ADMIN_KEY: CHANGEME

In this example, we have Docker Compose launching the OSS Form.io container with the ADMIN_KEY set for this deployment, the UAG is connected using http://formio:3000 which is the local Docker network name (provided using the "links" property in the docker compose file).

Local Connection to Enterprise Server Project

If you are using the Enterprise Form.io server within a local environment to the UAG, then you will need to ensure that the UAG connects to an independent project using the PROJECT_KEY as follows.

docker-compose.yml

services:
  formio-enterprise:
    image: formio/formio-enterprise
    restart: always
    environment:
      PORT: 3000
  formio-uag:
    image: formio/uag
    restart: always
    links:
      - formio-enterprise
    depends_on:
      - formio-enterprise
    environment:
      PROJECT: http://formio-enterprise:3000/myproject
      PROJECT_KEY: CHANGEME

Public DNS

If your project does not reside on the same network as the UAG, you can provide the domain name as the PROJECT as follows.

docker-compose.yml: Connected to Enterprise (formio/formio-enterprise)

services:
  formio-uag:
    image: formio/uag
    restart: always
    environment:
      PROJECT: https://forms.mydomain.com/myproject
      PROJECT_KEY: CHANGEME

docker-compose.yml: Connected to Open Source (formio/formio)

services:
  formio-uag:
    image: formio/uag
    restart: always
    environment:
      PROJECT: https://forms.mydomain.com
      ADMIN_KEY: CHANGEME

BASE_URL

The BASE_URL tells the UAG what URL it is reachable at. This value is published within the .well-known definitions for the OIDC (PKCE) authentication, and is used for the authentication callbacks.

BASE_URL is always required, including for local clients. The UAG's authentication provider is only enabled when it is set, so if you omit it, /mcp returns a 401 for every request and the /auth/token and /.well-known/* endpoints do not exist at all (404). A 404 on /auth/token is the clearest signal that BASE_URL is missing.

What it needs to be set to depends on how agents connect:

• Remote agents connect in: this must be the publicly accessible domain hosting your UAG, because that is the address the agent is told to authenticate against. For example, BASE_URL: https://forms.mysite.com.
• Local MCP client only: set it to the address your client uses to reach the UAG. A private or localhost URL is fine — for example BASE_URL: http://localhost:3200 or BASE_URL: http://formio-uag:3200 within a Docker network.

If a remote agent cannot authenticate, a mismatched BASE_URL is the most common cause: the agent reads this value from the discovery document and will follow it, so if it points somewhere the agent cannot reach, authentication fails even though the UAG itself is running correctly.

LOGIN_FORM

This is the URL to the Login form of your Project or OSS deployment. It provides the form that is loaded when a user navigates to {{ BASE_URL }}/auth/authorize. If you navigate to this URL, and the page says that you cannot load the form, then this is because your LOGIN_FORM environment variable is not pointing to the correct form JSON endpoint of your project.

This is only used by the browser-based login flow, so it needs to be reachable by the browser performing that login. A local MCP client authenticating with the client_credentials grant never loads this page.

For example:

• Enterprise Example: LOGIN_FORM: https://forms.mysite.com/myproject/user/login
• OSS Example: LOGIN_FORM: https://forms.mysite.com/user/login

Node.js (Express):

With the Node.js environment, you can import the UAG within a locally running Node.js and Express.js environment. This works by first importing the UAG module and "use"ing it within an Express.js application. First, you will install the UAG inside of your Node.js Express application like the following.

npm install --save @formio/uag

or

yarn add @formio/uag

You can then mount the UAG within your Express application, as seen in the following example:

import 'dotenv/config';
import Express from 'express';
import { UAGServer } from '@formio/uag';
try {
    (async function () {
        const server = new UAGServer();
        const app = Express();
        app.use(await server.router());
        const port = process.env.PORT || 3200;
        app.listen(port, () => {
            console.log(`Form.io UAG server running on port ${port}`);
            console.log(`Visit http://localhost:${port} to access the application`);
        });
    })();
} catch (error) {
    console.error('Failed to start server:', error);
    process.exit(1);
}

There is also a way to extend the functionality of the UAG through the use of modules, which is documented in the Modules Readme

Using with Form.io Enterprise Server

When using the UAG with the Form.io Enterprise Server, you unlock several benefits with regards to managing the Forms and Resources within the UAG. Some of the features that you gain with our Enterprise Server include:

• Form Revisions - Our form revision system provides a way to keep track of any changes made to any forms, and associate those changes with the submission data that is submitted against those revisions. This feature enables you to ensure that if any form schemas change, that the data submitted for that form correlates with the revision of the form in which it was submitted. In addition to this powerful feature, you can also leverage Form Revisions as a method to "roll-back" any mistakes or regressions caused by form changes. Instead of having to re-train or un-train an AI agent with any schema, you simply revert to previous revisions and the AI agent will adjust accordingly.
• Submission Revisions - Submission revisions provides a way to keep track of any data changes that have been made to a submission and provides information on who changed the data. This combined with the power of the UAG provides any system the ability to audit any changes in data made by both AI agents as well as humans in the workflow processes.
• Stage Versions and Deployments - Stage versions provides a way to create a "tag" version across all forms and resources within a project. This ensures that you can stamp a point in time where your AI agent (which may consume many different forms and resources) interfaces with your whole project in a deterministic way. It also provides a much more elegant "roll-back" mechanism where the entire project of forms and resources can be versioned and deployed independently.

Running the UAG against the Enterprise Server

In order to run the UAG against an Enterprise Server, you need to provide a few Environment variables that are different from the OSS runtime of this module. The following environment variables are required to run against an Enterprise Project.

Once you have these environment variables in place, you should be able to run the UAG pointed to your Enterprise Project.

Troubleshooting

Most UAG problems are configuration, not code, and they tend to surface far from their cause — a missing tag looks like a missing form, and a missing BASE_URL looks like a permissions error. The table below maps the symptoms you are likely to see back to what actually produces them.

If none of these apply, run one of the examples to confirm the environment itself is sound, then compare its configuration against yours.