cloudprice-mcp

alialbaker/cloudprice-mcp MCP server

The FinOps MCP server. Gives Claude, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, Continue, Zed — or any MCP-compatible AI — structured pricing data and analysis primitives across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI. AI clients use cloudprice-mcp to compute Reserved Instance break-even, multi-cloud workload TCO, exit-cost migration analyses, snapshot cost modeling, and egress arbitrage — the kind of FinOps decisions that normally live in three browser tabs and a half-built spreadsheet.

25 tools covering compute, block storage, object storage, managed Postgres, egress (internet + inter-region with OCI's 10 TB free tier surfaced explicitly), Multi-AZ workloads, snapshots with realistic incremental modeling, Reserved Instance / Savings Plan discounts, FinOps decision suite (migration, commitment, TCO, egress arbitrage), multi-cloud spot pricing with eviction tradeoffs, multi-cloud price history (the only public weekly-refreshed dataset of its kind), a stateless cost drift sentinel for scheduled agents, multi-cloud carbon footprint ($ AND kg CO2e on the same query), multi-cloud GPU pricing (T4 / A10 / L4 / L40S / V100 / A100 / H100 across all 4 clouds), cross-provider LLM token pricing (Claude / GPT / Gemini / Llama / Mistral / DeepSeek across Anthropic / OpenAI / Bedrock / Vertex / Azure OpenAI), statistical price-anomaly detection over the weekly snapshot archive (z-score + percent-change, auto-selected by dataset density), and CFO-grade FinOps decision report generation (markdown reports with executive summary, cost table, carbon, audit trail, honest gaps). OCI Always Free tier (4 OCPU compute, 20 GB object storage, 10 TB egress) surfaced as $0 line items where it applies.

One-line install configures every AI client you have: pip install cloudprice-mcp && cloudprice-mcp setup — auto-detects Claude Desktop, GitHub Copilot Agent Mode, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, Continue.dev, and Zed, then asks Y/N before writing each config.

demo

What does FinOps look like with cloudprice-mcp?

Real questions teams actually ask. Paste any of these into Claude / Copilot / Cursor with cloudprice-mcp loaded:

"I have 6× t3.2xlarge running on AWS. Compare the 3-year total cost on-demand vs 1-year Savings Plan vs 3-year RI partial upfront. What's the break-even month?" → AI calls compare_workload, pulls list-price baseline, layers AWS's published RI rates, returns dollar break-even. ~7-month payback typical.

"I'm thinking about offloading 5 TB of cold-tier object storage from AWS S3 to a cheaper provider. Compare archive-tier cost across all 4 clouds, factor in AWS exit egress, and tell me the payback period." → AI calls compare_object_storage + compare_egress, computes one-time exit cost vs ongoing savings. Often surfaces "don't move — AWS Glacier Deep Archive is already tied for cheapest".

"At 50 TB/month internet egress, where am I cheapest? Show the 3-year savings of moving." → compare_egress → OCI ~$340/mo, AWS/Azure/GCP ~$4,000/mo. The 12× difference is OCI's 10 TB free tier — a real moat for content/CDN workloads.

"Size a 3-tier SaaS workload: 8 web (4/16), 12 app (8/32), 4 DB (16/64), 5 TB shared SSD, 50 TB HDD bulk, 10 TB/month egress. Compare full-stack monthly cost across all 4 clouds with multi-AZ and 1-year commitment." → AI chains compare_workload + compare_egress, applies multi-AZ multiplier (×2 compute) + commitment discount.

What you get back: dollar numbers traceable to a public catalog, AI-explained tradeoffs, payback periods, and the kind of "don't do that" recommendation that kills bad migrations before they happen. No console-clicking. No tab-switching between three pricing calculators. No FinOps spreadsheet that goes stale the moment a new SKU drops.

Install

Recommended (auto-config):

pip install cloudprice-mcp
cloudprice-mcp setup     # auto-configures every detected MCP client, asks Y/N before writing

Then fully restart whichever clients were configured. 10 tools appear in each. Done.

Trust spectrum:

If something doesn't work, run:

cloudprice-mcp doctor

It tells you exactly what's broken (Python version, install path, config location, tool registration, command path validity).

Python 3.10+ required.

For step-by-step manual install (Windows / macOS / Linux), see INSTALL.md.

Tools exposed

Single-spec lookups (v0.1)

Bulk + workload compare (v0.2)

Object storage + managed Postgres (v0.3)

FinOps decision suite (v0.6, NEW)

Four named tools that turn cross-cloud pricing into FinOps decisions in one call instead of letting the AI chain three+ tools. All four consume a structured workload inventory (compute / storage / object_storage / databases / egress) plus tool-specific options.

All four tools accept a WorkloadInventory shape that mirrors a 4-section sizing sheet (compute / storage / object_storage / databases / egress) plus optional commitment, multi_az, and one_time.data_to_migrate_gb fields. Output includes honest_gaps — explicit list of what each tool does NOT model — to prevent over-trust.

Egress + Multi-AZ + better snapshots (v0.5, NEW)

Example: compare_workload input shape

{
  "compute": [
    { "name": "web", "tier": "Web", "vcpus": 4, "memory_gb": 16, "quantity": 8,  "os_disk_gb": 100, "os_disk_type": "ssd" },
    { "name": "app", "tier": "App", "vcpus": 8, "memory_gb": 32, "quantity": 12, "os_disk_gb": 200, "os_disk_type": "ssd" },
    { "name": "db",  "tier": "DB",  "vcpus": 16, "memory_gb": 64, "quantity": 4, "os_disk_gb": 500, "os_disk_type": "ssd" }
  ],
  "storage": [
    { "name": "shared-fast", "tier": "DB",  "capacity_gb": 5000,  "disk_type": "ssd" },
    { "name": "shared-bulk", "tier": "App", "capacity_gb": 50000, "disk_type": "hdd" }
  ]
}

Snapshots (v0.2.1)

snapshot_count on storage rows and os_disk_snapshot_count on compute rows are now priced. Snapshot rates per cloud per disk type are bundled (~$0.05/GB-mo for AWS/Azure, ~$0.026/GB-mo for GCP).

Caveat — upper-bound estimate: snapshots are priced as snapshot_per_gb_month × full_capacity × quantity × snapshot_count. Real-world snapshots are incremental (only changed blocks), so actual cost is typically 20-50% of this model's number. If snapshots dominate your total, ask the cloud's calculator for a tighter estimate.

iops and throughput_mbs on storage rows are still accepted as metadata only — not used for SKU matching in this release.

Reserved Instance / Savings Plan estimator (v0.2.1)

compare_workload accepts an optional commitment parameter:

Storage and snapshots are not discounted (most clouds don't offer meaningful storage commitments). Discount tiers are conservative averages — your actual rate depends on instance family, payment option, and region.

Pricing data

Prices are bundled as a curated dataset of common SKUs across 4 clouds:

• Compute (~50 VM SKUs across AWS / Azure / GCP / OCI, including OCI A1 Always Free + A2 Arm Ampere + E5 Flex)
• Block storage (SSD + HDD per cloud)
• Object storage (Hot / Cool / Archive tiers per cloud, including OCI Always Free 20 GB)
• Managed PostgreSQL (RDS / Azure DB / Cloud SQL / OCI Database with PostgreSQL)

Auto-refreshed weekly (v0.7+)

The bundled catalog is refreshed every Sunday by a GitHub Action that hits each cloud's public pricing API:

• AWS — Pricing API (via boto3, OIDC-authenticated)
• Azure — Retail Prices API (public, no auth)
• OCI — Public pricing API (public, no auth)
• GCP — Cloud Billing Catalog API (via API key — GCP_API_KEY env var). Added in v0.8.0
• Bedrock LLM token prices — AWS Pricing API AmazonBedrock service code (via boto3, same OIDC role). Added in v0.15.0 — refreshes input/output token rates for every Bedrock-hosted model we track (Claude 4 Opus/Sonnet, Claude 3/3.5 Haiku, Llama 3.1/3.3, Mistral Large 2, DeepSeek R1)
• Extended LLM catalog — LiteLLM's model_prices_and_context_window.json (MIT-licensed, community-maintained, unauthenticated). Added in v0.16.0 — ingests ~2000 (model, provider) combinations covering Together AI, Fireworks, Groq, Replicate, Perplexity, regional Bedrock/Azure variants, older model versions. Powers the lookup_extended_model_pricing tool. Curated hand-vetted prices (compare_token_pricing) and extended (lookup_extended_model_pricing) are deliberately separate so users always know which catalog they're hitting.

Each refresh writes a dated snapshot to src/cloudprice_mcp/data/prices/YYYY-MM-DD.json and src/cloudprice_mcp/data/token_prices/YYYY-MM-DD.json — every JSON ever published lives in the repo. The history archive is MIT-licensed and grows with every release.

Every tool result includes the catalog's as_of field so you know exactly which prices were used.

Public price history dataset (v0.7.1+)

cloudprice-mcp is the only FinOps tool we know of that preserves every weekly snapshot. You can query "what did m5.xlarge cost in May?" — neither AWS Calculator nor GCP Estimator can answer that because their pages always show today.

Query the history from the CLI:

cloudprice-mcp history --cloud oci --sku VM.Standard.E5.Flex.4OCPU
# oci/VM.Standard.E5.Flex.4OCPU (us-ashburn-1) — 2 data point(s)
#
# AS_OF          HOURLY USD
# --------------------------
# 2026-04-26   $    0.67600
# 2026-05-12   $    0.18400
#
# Change: -72.78% ($-0.49200/h)

The -72.78% drop is the v0.7.0 auto-refresh fixing a hand-curated inaccuracy in the prior OCI catalog — proof that the auto-refresh story works.

Query the history from AI assistants via two new MCP tools:

• get_price_history(cloud, sku, since?) — full timeseries + change stats
• list_tracked_skus(cloud?, since?) — every (cloud, sku) pair we have history for

Real questions this unlocks:

"Has AWS m5.xlarge changed price in the last quarter?" → AI calls get_price_history, returns timeseries with start/end prices and % change.

"Show me every multi-cloud price mover since January." → AI calls list_tracked_skus(since="2026-01-01"), returns every SKU + its latest price + change.

Cross-provider LLM token pricing (v0.12.0+)

Token costs are the fastest-growing FinOps line item in 2026 — and nobody compares them cross-provider openly. The same model is often available on multiple providers at different prices (Claude on Anthropic / Bedrock / Vertex; GPT on OpenAI / Azure OpenAI; Llama on Bedrock).

from cloudprice_mcp.finops.tokens import compare_token_pricing

# Cheapest model overall for a 50M-in / 10M-out monthly workload
r = compare_token_pricing(
    monthly_input_tokens=50_000_000,
    monthly_output_tokens=10_000_000,
)
# gemini-1.5-flash on google is cheapest at $6.75/mo for 50M in / 10M out tokens.
#   gemini-1.5-flash       on google        $   6.75/mo
#   gemini-1.5-flash       on vertex        $   6.75/mo
#   gemini-2.0-flash       on google        $   9.00/mo
#   llama-3.1-8b           on bedrock       $  13.20/mo
#   gpt-4o-mini            on openai        $  13.50/mo
#   deepseek-v3            on deepseek      $  24.50/mo

# Same model across all hosts — proves Claude 4 Sonnet provider parity
# (and surfaces that only Anthropic API publishes the 90%-off cache_read rate)
r = compare_token_pricing(model_id="claude-4-sonnet")
#   anthropic   in=$3/1M  out=$15/1M  cache_read=$0.30/1M  cache_write=$3.75/1M
#   bedrock     in=$3/1M  out=$15/1M
#   vertex      in=$3/1M  out=$15/1M

Covers 19 models across 8 providers: Claude (4 Opus / 4 Sonnet / 3.5 Haiku / 3 Haiku), GPT (5, 5 mini, 4o, 4o-mini, o1), Gemini (2.0 Flash, 1.5 Pro/Flash), Llama (3.1 8B/70B/405B, 3.3 70B), Mistral Large 2, DeepSeek V3/R1.

Real questions this unlocks:

"Cheapest model that handles 200K context for output-heavy chat at 10M/mo output volume?" → AI calls compare_token_pricing with the volume + an optional model_family filter, returns ranked monthly cost across every viable model+provider combo.

"Should I use Anthropic API or Bedrock for Claude?" → compare_token_pricing(model_id="claude-4-sonnet") shows price parity on per-token rates, but Anthropic API exposes a 10x cheaper cache_read rate that Bedrock doesn't publish. For caching-heavy workloads, Anthropic wins.

Multi-cloud GPU pricing (v0.11.0+)

The fastest-growing cloud cost category — and nobody compares it cross-cloud openly.

from cloudprice_mcp.finops.gpu import compare_gpu_workload
from cloudprice_mcp.pricing import load_catalog

r = compare_gpu_workload(load_catalog(), gpu_type="H100", gpu_count=8)
# OCI BM.GPU.H100.8 is cheapest at $80.0000/h for 8x H100.
#   oci    BM.GPU.H100.8                  $ 80.0000/h  $10.0000/GPU/h
#   gcp    a3-highgpu-8g                  $ 84.4000/h  $10.5500/GPU/h
#   aws    p5.48xlarge                    $ 98.3200/h  $12.2900/GPU/h
#   azure  ND96isr_H100_v5                $ 98.3200/h  $12.2900/GPU/h

Covers NVIDIA T4, A10, A10G, L4, L40S, V100, A100, H100 across all 4 clouds. Returns:

• Absolute hourly winner — the cheapest matching SKU per cloud
• Per-GPU efficiency winner — sometimes a different cloud (e.g., OCI's BM.GPU4.8 is cheapest per GPU but only sold as 8x, so for gpu_count=1 Azure/GCP win the absolute ranking)
• Over-provisioning flags — when the only matching SKU bundles more GPUs than asked for
• GPU memory — differentiates A100 40GB vs 80GB (same gpu_type field)

The OCI H100 finding is real: at 8x H100 it's ~19% cheaper than AWS/Azure for identical hardware.

Cost Drift Sentinel (v0.9.0+)

The shift from query tool to agent capability. Most FinOps tools answer "what does this cost?" — this one answers "is this still what it cost when I signed off on it?"

from cloudprice_mcp.finops.sentinel import watch_workload
from cloudprice_mcp.inventory import parse_dict
from cloudprice_mcp.pricing import load_catalog

# First call — captures a baseline. Persist the returned baseline JSON.
result = watch_workload(load_catalog(), parse_dict(workload_spec))
save(result["baseline"])

# Later — pass the baseline back to detect drift.
report = watch_workload(load_catalog(), parse_dict(workload_spec), baseline=load_baseline())
if report["alert_triggered"]:
    notify_humans(report["headline"])

Stateless by design — no server, no database. The baseline JSON lives wherever you want: a file in your IaC repo, S3, Slack DM, anywhere. Each call is a pure function of (catalog, workload, baseline).

Key properties:

• Workload-hash protected — if you change the workload spec, the hash mismatches and you get a fresh baseline rather than a misleading drift report
• SKU-level attribution — the drift report consults the price-history dataset and surfaces which SKUs moved the most between baseline and now
• Configurable threshold — default 5%; pass alert_threshold_pct=N to tune

Plug-and-play GitHub Action template at examples/cloudprice-watch.yml — drop it in any IaC repo with a workload.json, get auto-opened GitHub issues when costs drift. Baseline is committed to your repo so the history is auditable.

Carbon-aware FinOps (v0.10.0+) — kg CO2e per workload, alongside USD

The only FinOps MCP tool that returns both cost AND carbon footprint on the same query. AWS / Azure / GCP each publish their own customer dashboards (Customer Carbon Footprint Tool, Emissions Impact Dashboard, Carbon Footprint) — but none compare across providers. cloudprice does.

from cloudprice_mcp.finops.carbon import compare_carbon_footprint
from cloudprice_mcp.pricing import load_catalog

result = compare_carbon_footprint(load_catalog(), vcpus=8, memory_gb=32, quantity=6)
# Returns per-cloud SKU + cost + power class (x86/ARM) + monthly kWh +
# grid-based kg CO2e + market-based residual kg CO2e (after renewable matching),
# ranked cheapest-carbon-first.

What's modeled (and disclosed in every response):

• PUE per cloud from each provider's public sustainability report
• Grid carbon intensity per region from public emissions data (EPA eGRID for US, similar baselines elsewhere)
• Renewable matching per provider (AWS/Azure 100%, GCP ~64% CFE, OCI unmatched outside EU)
• ARM vs x86 power class — ARM SKUs (Graviton, Ampere, Axion) modeled at ~30% lower per-vCPU power
• Two carbon numbers per cloud: location-based (grid) AND market-based (residual after renewable matching) — both surfaced so auditors can see both perspectives

What's NOT modeled (always disclosed via honest_gaps[]):

• Embodied carbon (server manufacturing) — operational only
• GPU / network / storage power — compute + memory only
• Time-of-use grid variation — annual averages only
• Real-time 24/7 CFE matching — GCP publishes annual CFE %; cloudprice uses that

Real questions this unlocks:

"What's the lowest-carbon cloud for 4 vCPU / 16 GB at 6 instances?" → AI calls compare_carbon_footprint, returns per-cloud kg CO2e/mo ranked.

"How much carbon do I save running on ARM vs x86?" → AI calls it twice with the same shape but different target SKUs.

What's NOT modeled (real-world TCO killers)

• ✅ Egress / data transfer — modeled in v0.5 (compare_egress)
• ✅ Multi-AZ / HA replicas — modeled in v0.5 (multi_az: true on compare_workload)
• ✅ Snapshots upper-bound only — fixed in v0.5 (snapshot_incremental_factor)
• Reserved/Savings Plan SKU detail (we apply a flat tier discount, not per-region/per-family detail) — roadmap
• Multi-region pricing (currently us-east only; us-west / eu-west planned for v0.5.1) — roadmap
• IOPS-based storage matching (capacity-only) — roadmap
• Backup storage charges (some clouds free, others billed) — roadmap
• Request costs (PUT/GET pricing for object storage) — roadmap
• Retrieval costs for archive tiers (Glacier-style retrieval can be 10× the storage cost) — roadmap
• VPC peering / interconnect costs — roadmap

These are tracked roadmap items. Use cloudprice-mcp for the on-demand list-price baseline; do final TCO analysis with each cloud's own calculator before relying on numbers for big decisions.

Live runtime pricing (not just weekly refresh) is being considered for v0.8 — would fetch prices directly at MCP tool invocation time instead of from the bundled catalog. Trade-offs: slower (network call per tool use), adds GCP auth requirement, breaks offline mode. The v0.7 weekly auto-refresh covers ~95% of the credibility win at zero runtime cost; live mode is opt-in territory.

Develop locally

git clone https://github.com/Albaker-Group/cloudprice-mcp.git
cd cloudprice-mcp
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest

To point Claude Desktop at your dev copy, swap the command in the config:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cloudprice": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "cloudprice_mcp.server"]
    }
  }
}

License

MIT — see LICENSE.

Credits

Built by Ali Albaker, multi-cloud architect — runs a live three-cloud portfolio at ~$1.80/month across AWS, Azure, and GCP, with OCI joining as the 4th cloud in 2026.