Read, create, update and delete gists on a self-hosted Opengist instance
io.github.ni-c/opengist-mcp (MCP) Server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) server “io.github.ni-c/opengist-mcp” enables reading, creating, updating, and deleting gists on a self-hosted Opengist instance. It is associated with a project named “opengist-mcp” and is published as an npm package.
🛠️ Key Features
Read gists
Create gists
Update gists
Delete gists
Targets a self-hosted Opengist deployment
🚀 Use Cases
Manage snippet-like content stored as gists on Opengist
Perform CRUD operations from an MCP-connected workflow
⚡ Developer Benefits
Integration via Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Package available on npm (with published version and download stats)
⚠️ Limitations
Documentation excerpt provided does not describe authentication, permissions, or supported transports beyond Opengist CRUD operations
Lets MCP clients like Claude Code, Claude Desktop or Codex read, search, create, update and delete gists on your own Opengist instance: file contents and revisions, commit history, forks and likes, plus your user account.
Fourteen tools is the ceiling, not the floor: OPENGIST_ALLOW_TOOLS=essential
registers a curated seven instead, and a model picks the right tool far more
reliably from seven than from fourteen — see
choosing which tools load.
Listing the tools, narrowing them to the essential preset, and the startup abort a mistyped tool name produces
Note: this server talks to the Opengist REST API under /api, which is available in recent Opengist releases and enabled by default (api.enabled). A running instance serves its own OpenAPI spec at GET /api/openapi.yaml — compare it against your version if a tool behaves unexpectedly.
What makes it different
Fourteen tools over one API surface, derived from the Opengist REST API and
verified against a live instance: reading, searching, writing, forking and liking
gists, including revisions, commit history and raw file access.
Bounded by construction. File contents are capped per file and against an
overall budget, binary files are never dumped as text, and every truncation names
the call that fetches the rest.
Requirements
Node.js 22 or newer
An Opengist instance with the REST API enabled
An Opengist Personal Access Token (Settings → Access Tokens). Scopes:
gist:read — read gists, including your private and unlisted ones
gist:write — create, update, delete and fork gists
user:read — read your own account
user:write — only needed for set_gist_like
A token withoutgist:read still works, but the API then silently returns only public gists instead of failing.
Configuration
Variable
Required
Description
OPENGIST_URL
yes
Base URL of your instance, e.g. https://gist.example.com. A trailing /api is accepted and stripped.
OPENGIST_TOKEN
yes
Personal Access Token, starts with og_
OPENGIST_READ_ONLY
no
true, 1 or yes registers only the read tools; the write tools do not exist at all in that session
OPENGIST_INSECURE_TLS
no
true accepts self-signed certificates, scoped to the Opengist connection (never process-wide)
OPENGIST_ALLOW_TOOLS
no
Comma-separated tool names, list_* prefixes, or essential for a curated preset
OPENGIST_DENY_TOOLS
no
Same syntax; removed from whatever OPENGIST_ALLOW_TOOLS left
ELICITATION
no
false replaces the approval dialog with the two-call token. Not prefixed
The token is read once at startup and then removed from process.env, so it is not visible to child processes. Use https:// for anything but a loopback address — over plain http the token and every gist travel in cleartext.
If your instance's external-url is not configured, the URLs Opengist reports (and this server passes through) point at localhost. Set external-url / OG_EXTERNAL_URL on the instance so links are usable.
Choosing which tools load
OPENGIST_ALLOW_TOOLS and OPENGIST_DENY_TOOLS take comma-separated tool names;
a trailing * matches a whole family. essential is a curated preset of
seven: list_gists, search_gists, get_gist, get_gist_file, create_gist, update_gist, delete_gist.
An entry that matches no tool aborts startup and names it, so a typo cannot
silently hide a tool — an absent tool is not something anyone traces back to an
environment variable. A filtered tool is never registered, so it is absent from
tools/list and unknown to tools/call alike, exactly like a write tool under
OPENGIST_READ_ONLY.
If you run several of these servers at once, mcp-hub
is the other answer — its /hub endpoint replaces every server's tools with six
meta-tools.
Installation
Claude Code
sh
claude mcp add opengist -s user \
-e OPENGIST_URL=https://gist.example.com \
-e OPENGIST_TOKEN=og_your_token \
-- npx -y opengist-mcp
-i is required — the transport is stdio. Do not add -t; a TTY corrupts the
protocol stream.
From source
sh
git clone https://github.com/ni-c/opengist-mcp.git
cd opengist-mcp
npm install
npm run build
Through mcp-hub
A client that cannot spawn a local process — ChatGPT connectors, Claude on the web,
Cursor, LibreChat — reaches opengist-mcp through mcp-hub: one
container serves many stdio MCP servers over Streamable HTTP, with an OAuth 2.1 login
behind a single password and long-lived tokens for the clients that cannot do OAuth. Its
/hub endpoint puts every server behind six meta-tools, so one connector reaches all of
them without N×tool schemas in the model's context, and it speaks both protocol revisions
— a question this server asks travels through it to the person at the far end.
Its /config/mcp.json uses Claude Code's format, so the entry is the one you already
have:
allowTools and denyTools there are the hub's own per-server filter, which is not
the same thing as *_ALLOW_TOOLS in env — the difference, and the mistake it invites,
are in the client guide.
Tools
Reading
Tool
Description
list_gists
List gists: your own, another user's, all public ones, or liked/forked ones (scope + optional username)
search_gists
Find gists by title, description, topics or owner — a bounded client-side scan (Opengist has no search API)
get_gist
Get one gist with its file contents, optionally at a revision; commits and forks on request
get_gist_file
Get the raw content of a single file, at a revision and from an offset — for large or truncated files
list_gist_commits
Commit history of a gist, newest first
list_gist_forks
Forks of a gist
get_user
Your own account, or another user by username or userId
check_gist_like
Whether you liked a gist; distinguishes "not liked" from "not visible to you"
Writing
Tool
Description
create_gist 👤
Create a gist from a list of files. visibility is required; public/unlisted asks a person
update_gist
Change title/description/visibility and write or rename files. Cannot delete files
delete_gist_files 👤
Delete files from a gist — the approval is bound to exactly those filenames
delete_gist 👤
Delete a gist permanently
fork_gist
Fork a gist; reports whether a new fork was created or one already existed
set_gist_like
Like or unlike a gist idempotently (reads the current state first, so a repeat call is not a toggle)
Structured output
Every tool declares an outputSchema and answers with structuredContent
alongside the text block, so a client can use the result without parsing prose:
Every tool that reports gist content carries untrusted: true and
source: "opengist" as fields. This server has always said so in notes —
prose in a list, which a client can read but not check — and the field is what
makes it checkable. Three tools are without it, because their answer is entirely
this server's own words: check_gist_like, set_gist_like and delete_gist
report an id they were given and a boolean.
An over-budget result still drops file contents first. Where that is not enough
it is now an error: it used to answer with the JSON cut at the ceiling,
which a text block tolerates and structuredContent cannot.
Safety
Irreversible actions ask a person.delete_gist, delete_gist_files and widening a gist's visibility raise a real dialog through MCP elicitation where the client supports it — one the model cannot answer on its behalf. A plain confirm: true flag could be set by the model on its own, or be talked into it by text inside a gist. Where the client cannot show a dialog they refuse the first call and return a random, single-use token that expires after five minutes; that proves the call was made twice with the same arguments and nothing more, and the text says so. Either way the approval for delete_gist_files is bound to the exact set of filenames, so one for a single file cannot be replayed to delete another. ELICITATION=false takes the fallback deliberately; it never removes the guard. See Asking a person.
Publishing content is asked about the same way. Creating a public or unlisted gist, and writing files into a gist that already is one, are disclosure events: whatever the model has in its context becomes readable by others and cannot be withdrawn from anyone who already saw it. Both ask before they act. The approval is bound to the exact content, so one for a single file cannot be replayed with a second one attached. A call that makes the gist private in the same breath is not a disclosure and is not asked about.
Confirmations are checked after validation. A call that could not succeed anyway is reported as the input error it is, rather than first costing a confirmation round-trip.
Confirmation prompts never quote gist text. Titles, descriptions, topics and filenames are user-supplied and could carry instructions aimed at manufacturing a confirmation, so refusals show only server-side metadata (visibility, file count, dates).
update_gist cannot delete a file. The Opengist API deletes a file when its entry is nullor carries neither content nor filename — exactly the shape a sloppily built object has. This server therefore never exposes the raw file map; it accepts explicit write/rename operations and asserts before sending that no entry could be read as a deletion. Files you do not mention are left untouched.
Typos cannot silently duplicate a file. A write to a filename that does not exist is refused unless allowCreate: true is passed, and the refusal names a case-insensitive near match (readme.md vs README.md).
Gist content is untrusted input. Every response that carries file content is tagged with a note saying so. Treat gist text as data, never as instructions.
Results are bounded. File contents are capped per file and against an overall budget, commits and forks are omitted by default, binary files are not dumped as text, and every truncation is reported together with the call that fetches the rest. search_gists states how much it scanned and marks incomplete results explicitly.
The instance is read, not trusted. Every response goes through one boundary: a field of the wrong type is absent rather than fatal, counts are finite, a commit id has the shape of one before it is used, and display strings are cut. Every string that leaves is stripped of control characters and repaired of lone surrogates; where that touches a file body the result says how many characters it removed, per file.
Requests are hardened. Redirects are refused so the bearer token cannot be replayed to another host, every request carries a timeout, path parameters reject ./.. and are URL-encoded, and upstream error bodies are truncated with HTML error pages dropped entirely.
Residual risk:OPENGIST_READ_ONLY and the approval flow are client-side guards. The real boundary is the scope of your access token and the permission prompts of your MCP host. A token limited to gist:read/user:read cannot write, whatever the model attempts.
Not exposed, on purpose
Not a git client. It talks to the REST API. Cloning, pushing and branching are
git's job — clone_url and ssh_url come back so you can hand them to git.
Not an admin tool. There is nothing here for users, settings or instance
administration, and get_user returns an allowlisted set of fields rather than
whatever the API happens to include.
Not a search index. Opengist has no search endpoint, so search_gists works
with what the API offers rather than pretending to more.
Safety
Everything Opengist returns was written by a person, and quite possibly not by
you — file contents, titles, descriptions, topics and git author names are
marked as untrusted data, to be reported rather than followed.
Results are bounded: file contents are capped per file and against an overall
budget, binary files are never dumped as text, and every truncation names the
call that fetches the rest.
Deleting a gist or its files, and widening a gist's visibility, ask a person
first through MCP elicitation. Where the client cannot show a dialog, the call
is refused and carries a random single-use token that expires after five
minutes and only ever appeared in a previous tool result.
Two ways to stop it writing, and they are not equivalent:
OPENGIST_READ_ONLY=true does not register the write tools, which this server
enforces; a token scoped to gist:read and user:read cannot write whatever
this server or the model does. Use the second one when it matters.
A public gist is a publishing channel — world-readable on most instances, and
indexed. Making one is a decision, which is why it asks.
Bump the version in package.json and server.json, move the ## [Unreleased] section of CHANGELOG.md to the new version, commit, then push a tag:
sh
git tag -a v0.1.0 -m "v0.1.0"
git push origin main v0.1.0
The release workflow verifies that the tag matches the package version, publishes to npm via OIDC trusted publishing (no long-lived token), waits for the container image to appear on GHCR, registers the release in the MCP registry and creates a GitHub release from the changelog section.
If the registry step fails, fix it on main and dispatch mcp-registry.yml — never re-run the tagged job, which checks out the immutable tag.
Releasing
Releases are tag-driven. Bump package.json, move the [Unreleased] notes in
CHANGELOG.md under the new version, commit, then:
sh
git tag -s vX.Y.Z -m "vX.Y.Z"
git push origin main vX.Y.Z
The release workflow publishes to npm via Trusted Publishing (OIDC, with
provenance), pushes the multi-arch container image to GHCR, creates the GitHub
release from the CHANGELOG section, and updates the entry in the official MCP
registry.
Contributing
Issues, discussions and pull requests are welcome — see
CONTRIBUTING.md. For vulnerabilities please use
private reporting
rather than a public issue; the policy is in SECURITY.md.