Local-first code context, impact analysis, and merge-readiness verdicts for AI agents.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server: io.github.nugehs/repoctx
The io.github.nugehs/repoctx MCP server provides local-first code context features focused on impact analysis and merge-readiness verdicts for AI agents. It is positioned around code mapping and PR review/merge-gate workflows, using MCP to expose these capabilities to client tools.
🛠️ Key Features
Local-first code context
Code impact analysis
Merge-readiness verdicts
Code map for repository context
🚀 Use Cases
Assist AI agents during PR review
Evaluate whether changes are safe to merge (merge-gate)
Generate repository analysis context for developer tooling
⚡ Developer Benefits
Developer tools integration via MCP
Standardized access to code context, code-map, and merge-gate outputs
Supports PR-review workflows with merge-readiness signals
⚠️ Limitations
Tooling scope is described at the level of code context, impact analysis, and merge verdicts; implementation details are not provided in the provided data.
Otito is a local-first, deterministic, model-agnostic trust layer for AI-assisted development. It builds task-aware repository context before an agent edits, scores how much a change actually touches, and gates merge readiness against the exact staged tree, with no server, no account, and no code leaving the machine.
It does not replace Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, or any native agent harness. It runs beside them and keeps working as the models change underneath.
A passing local gate is never an automatic merge approval: hosted CI, GitHub review, CODEOWNERS, and the human release decision remain separate authorities.
Install
bash
npm install -g @bashbop/otito
otito doctor
Or without installing: npx -y @bashbop/otito doctor.
What it does
Rank what a change actually touches, from the request alone, with no model, no embeddings, and no network:
Gate the exact staged tree, and say precisely why:
console
$ otito gate . --staged --base origin/main --request "add refund handling to checkout" --min-convergence 80
[OK] Changed files 1 changed file found.
[OK] Staged snapshot Changed-file scope and convergence evidence are captured from the exact staged Git tree.
|- Tree: 7d0b513dd256877d6bd309a6406468a9b1eaeedc
|- Base: b776f04fcfbd02c8ce8d63e1a0c2450be58de039
[OK] Secret safety No secret file paths and no credential values found in the changed content.
[WARN] Risk review Risk-sensitive files changed; maintainer review should be explicit.
|- src/payment/checkout.service.ts
[OK] Convergence Task and diff satisfy the convergence requirement.
|- Score: 100/100 (aligned)
|- Receipt handle: rcpt_a8d31efae06e
|- Subject tree: 7d0b513dd256877d6bd309a6406468a9b1eaeedc
VERDICT WARN
The convergence score is the part a model cannot grade for itself: it compares the stated intent against the files the diff actually changed, and produces a receipt bound to the exact base, parent, and staged-tree identity.
The core
Three commands are the product. They call no model, open no socket, and read nothing outside the repository.
Nothing hosted is required, and nothing hosted can change a verdict. Local Core, Optional Hosted lists exactly what the optional pieces send, and where.
Supporting commands
Goal
Command
Rank change blast radius
otito impact . "add refund handling" --top 12
Score intent vs. execution
otito converge "add refunds" --path . --base HEAD --staged
Score a committed change exactly
otito converge "add refunds" --path . --base HEAD~1 --head HEAD
Published in the MCP Registry as io.github.BASHBOP/otito. Repo-map lookups use an external per-user cache and never write into the inspected repository. Host-specific setup for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Gemini CLI, and Kimi Code is in MCP and Agent Workflows.
How it compares
Approach
Strengths
Where otito differs
Sourcegraph / Cody context
Powerful hosted code search and embedding-based context across an org
Local-first and deterministic: no server, no account, no code leaves the machine, and the same query always yields the same packet
Hand-written CLAUDE.md / rules files
Curated, intent-rich guidance
Hand-written context goes stale; otito regenerates context from the actual code (symbols, imports, routes, tests) on every run and complements a short CLAUDE.md
grep / ripgrep
Fast, universal text matching
otito ranks whole files by task intent across paths, symbols, exports, and tests, then adds patterns and validation commands, producing a context packet rather than a list of matching lines
Documentation
Full command reference, agent workflows, release process, evaluation method, and the design theses behind the trust layer:
git clone https://github.com/BASHBOP/otito.git
cd otito && npm ci && npm run ci
npm run ci is the full gate: format, lint, typecheck, version check, tests, coverage floors (70% lines / 60% branches / 75% functions), three evaluation corpora, dependency audit, and a packaged-tarball smoke test. Run it before requesting review.
Start with CONTRIBUTING.md and the Code of Conduct. All changes need maintainer review; main requires passing gates and resolved conversations. Otito follows Semantic Versioning, so say whether a PR is no-impact, patch, minor, or major.
Part of the toolchain
otito is one of four tools that form a deterministic trust layer for AI-assisted development. Each uses static analysis to answer a question people keep handing to an LLM.
otito (this tool), for context: what does this change actually touch?
tieline, for contracts: did the front end and back end quietly stop agreeing?
bouncer, for compliance: could you defend this to Ofcom?
aiglare, for governance: where can the model do something you can't undo?